Page under revision, Aug 2019
A promise to “appoint an independent expert to review our forestry practices” was first cited publicly as an item in the Liberal’s pre-election budget address on April 17, 2017. The Liberals won the election and on Aug 30, 2017 the government announced the review was beginning, that it would be headed up by University of King’s College President William Lahey and that it would take place in three phases with a final report on February 28, 2018.
The Report from the Independent Review of Forest Practices in Nova Scotia, now known more colloquially as the “Lahey Report” was released on Aug 21, 2018 in two volumes:
– An Independent Review of Forest Practices in Nova Scotia: Executive Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations
By William Lahey. 82 pages
– An Independent Review of Forest Practices in Nova Scotia: Addendum
“This addendum to Professor William Lahey’s Independent Review of Forest Practices in Nova Scotia includes background material and supporting documents prepared by the expert advisors who provided assistance to the Review. The writing of each section of this addendum has been led by the named author(s). All sections have been reviewed by other members of the Review team. In addition, this addendum includes an appendix of submissions that were prepared at Prof. Lahey’s request by other individuals and organizations.”
The NS Government issued its response to The Review on Dec 3, 2018, in two volumes:
…And while Lahey predicted less clear cutting would lead to a reduction of Crown land wood supply of 10 to 20 per cent, Rankin disagreed.
“We believe that we can sustainably grow this industry.”
Subsequently, Lands and Forestry provided updates to their response to the Independent Review on the same webpage that had hosted info about the review as it proceeded under the title “Independent Review of Forest Practices in Nova Scotia”, retitling the page at some point as “Ecological Forestry Implementation“.
Chapter 1 in the Addendum – Forest Practices Review Process, prepared by David Foster, provides a summary of the Independent Review process.
Posts on this website provide some of the history and context leading up to the independent Review – see Independent Review>News Items – and subsequently.
The Lahey Report echoed many of the recommendations by Bob Bancroft and Donna Crossland (2010) as part of the Natural Resources Strategy, notably in recognizing excessive clearcutting in NS, and the need to adopt in their words, ” an ecologically based, multi-aged forest management paradigm”.
Overall the Lahey Report has received strong support form conservation groups and the more ecologically oriented forestry groups (notably NSWOOA), with some reservations, e.g. as I expressed here.
However, subsequent to the release of the Lahey Report and up to now (Aug 2019), there has been little evidence of change on-the-ground except, apparently, for a rush to harvest as much as possible before real changes are required by L&F. There has been a great deal of public protest about ongoing practices and emergence of several very knowledgable and vocal groups on Social Media.
The possible closure of the Northern Pulp mill at Pictou in early 2020 could have dramatic effects on forests and forestry practices independent of the Lahey Report.
So there is much in flux in regard to the state of forests and forestry in Nova Scotia in August of 2019, now almost one year after the release of the Lahey Report.