Related Post oct 30, 2018: Biodiverse Southwest Nova Scotia at Risk
Many Nova Scotians were elated when their government announced on Dec 12, 2012 that it had acquired all of the Bowater lands for sale in the province, which followed closure of the Bowater Mill in western Nova Scotia in June of 2012. “This is an extraordinary day for Nova Scotia”, said Chris Miller of CPAWS (Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society). “An important resource has been acquired, creating opportunities both for conservation and a sustainable forest industry.” See CPAWS welcomes Bowater land purchase in Nova Scotia.
A Western Crown Lands Consultation was set up in late 2012 which fed into A conceptual plan for Western Nova Scotia, drafted in March 2013 and updated in 2014 and 2015. Guidelines for Biodiversity-Rich Landscapes under the Western Crown Lands Conceptual Plan were released in July of 2015.
An early component of this process was an invitation to submit proposals for Community Forests. The Medway Community Forest Co-op became Nova Scotia’s first community forestry pilot with an allocation of 15,000 ha of Crown land on the former Bowater lands. An Agreement signed on January 30, 2015 established a 3-year term for the initial project. More to cheer about, perhaps. (Another proposal for a community forest in the St. Margaret’s Bay district was turned down.)
It turned out, not to everyone’s complete surprise, that the community forest component was dwarfed by agreements with big industry beginning, apparently, with secretly negotiated increases in the allocations of Crown land for Northern Pulp including access to the Western Crown Lands. (A CBC radio interview with Matt Miller provides some further context.) On Oct 9, 2014, the government announced its forestry plan for the western Crown lands and released 10-year fibre allocations for the lands. By Nov 5, 2015, a newly formed Nova Scotia mill consortium, WestFor, was set to begin cutting on 566,000 hectares.
So the agreements gave big industry 10 years to get all it can, but only 3 years and a very limited land base for the community forest project to get up and running.
There were some hiccups in this furious race to sign agreements and begin cutting western Nova Scotia before the public took notice.
A freedom of information request made public by the Ecology Action Centre on June 24, 2014 revealed that the biodiversity science advisory team for the western Crown lands planning process had expressed “concern that biodiversity is being sacrificed for harvesting…several areas of high biodiversity aren’t identified in the province’s plan…The key concern here is that the priority given to forestry in these areas is presented as the outcome of an integrated and balanced planning process, when it appears that, in reality, biodiversity was simply devalued where it might impinge upon forestry if accommodated.”
Then EAC discovered (Sept 10, 2014) that the government allowed clearcutting on an environmentally sensitive area of the recently acquired Bowater Mersey lands. This resulted in a review of the incident, and a report was issued in January of 2015. (There has been other followup- see Panuke.) The report included a recommendation for government to expand FSC certification to all Crown lands in the province.
The government said it would maintain and expand FSC certification on publicly owned Crown lands, acknowledging FSC as the “gold standard” for forest certification. But on March 1, 2016, the government did a complete flip-flop on FSC certification, adopting instead the much weaker Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) certification system.
There is broad suspicion that the flip-flop occurred because it was feared that FSC would not have approved the anticipated extent and intensity of clearcutting by the WestFor group. Adding fuel to this speculation, with the release of its Five-Year Progress Report on the Natural Resources Strategy on Aug 16, 2016, the government completely backed off a prior commitment to reduce clearcutting to 50% of all harvests. NSDNR maintains the commitment to reducing clearcutting is not needed as “we have now developed tools that ensure that all harvest treatments are aligned with the nature-based requirements of Nova Scotia’s lands”. (That claim is not consistent with some of NSDNR’s own numbers – see NSDNR’s nature-based forestry.)Interestingly (the lightest way it could be described), the Natural Resources Strategy Progress Report highlighted the Community Forest, but failed to mention the massive harvest planned for Western Crown Lands and other industrial forest priorities of the government designed to make use of degraded forests.
Could the detractors be blamed for calling it all a “Forest Tragedy“?
Posted 29 Sep 2016 | Updated 3 Oct 2016