Woods and Waters Nova Scotia
Re: “Mainland moose, forestry can co-exist, thrive,” Dec. 15.
To pre-empt the bad press that will inevitably result from the forcible removal of the encampment blockade, Marcus Zwicker, manager of WestFor Management Inc., published an official statement in this newspaper which defended the clearcutting of critically endangered mainland moose habitat as ecologically benign. The statement was at best disingenuous and at worst deliberately misleading. As someone with a master’s degree in landscape ecology who has been aggressively engaging with these issues, I feel a responsibility to set the record straight for the public.
(1) Zwicker claims WestFor harvests are conducted in line with mainland moose special management practices (SMPs). I’m sure that’s true. Given the massive spotlight that is shining on the debacle in Digby County right now, I have no doubt WestFor follows those practices to the letter.
Conveniently, Zwicker’s statement excluded any details about precisely what regulations are mandated under the SMPs. I am not surprised by the omission, as any reasonable reader would find them laughable (as wildlife biologists do) and grossly insufficient if one is actually serious about protecting the critically endangered mainland moose.
In practice, the only thing the SMPs achieve is provide reputational cover for clearcutting. They allow companies like those that comprise WestFor to devastate entire ecosystems with industrial logging equipment, so long as tiny clumps of trees (0.001 km2) are spared. When trying to protect wide-ranging species like the mainland moose (home-range size in SWNS: ~55km2), “retention patches” of 0.001 km2 are not a serious, good-faith conservation measure. They are a joke.
(2) Equally egregious is what Zwicker’s statement did not say. It did not mention the fact that the provincial government is required by law to designate “core moose habitat” (in which even-aged forest harvests, such as those almost universally employed by WestFor, would be forbidden). It did not mention that, from 2003 (when the moose was first listed as endangered) to this day, the government has refused. It also did not mention the fact that the government (and, I presume, WestFor) has been provided with strong evidence of regular moose presence in the area (photos of tracks + a map of recent sightings), and has chosen to ignore it.
(3) Zwicker’s statement claims that the mainland moose issue is complex and includes many pressing threats, including brain-worm, winter tick and poaching.
The single gravest threat to the mainland moose is habitat fragmentation and loss. Full stop. The same is true of many at-risk species that depend on contiguous, mature forest like the ones WestFor is clear-cutting in Digby.
Zwicker is not wrong to claim that parasites and poaching also pose major problems to moose, but it fails to mention that the continual construction of logging roads through moose habitat, as WestFor is doing, makes these same problems much more severe.
(4) Zwicker’s statement further says, “The media (has portrayed the area) as intact old growth forests, when in fact the area has been sustainably managed since the late 1800’s.” That Zwicker accuses the media of being disingenuous in the same sentence that it tries to convince the public that modern forestry is akin to that practiced in the late 1800s is particularly galling. As Zwicker and WestFor well know, mechanized logging equipment wasn’t invented until the second half of the 20th century, and industrial-scale forestry, like that practiced by their consortium, is an even more recent development.
Zwicker concludes by saying that “Forestry and the mainland moose can co-exist here as they do in many other areas across North America.” On its face, the encampment does not disagree with that. However, they (along with tens of thousands of Nova Scotians) do understand that moose cannot co-exist with forestry practices that result in ecosystems being converted to moonscapes. And that is the irreparable travesty that WestFor is committing in Digby as you read this.
Shanni Bale has a bachelor’s degree in ecology and a master’s degree in landscape ecology. She lives in Halifax.
Search this site
-
Recent Posts
- Nova Scotia Forest Notes: a record of goings-on in forests and forestry in Nova Scotia 21Jun2016-21Jun2022
- Shady Accounting and Vanishing Forests on Nova Scotia’s Crown Lands 14Jul2024
- Lichen Camp Day 127: symbiosis is always the topic 7Jul2024
- On our Wabanaki Forest 21Jun2024
- Fourteen students completed the first official tree marking course in Nova Scotia 20Jun2024
Recent Comments
- 2017 Media Wrap Up – Template Site on CPAWS report says we lag in land protection nationally and in Nova Scotia but sees signs of change
- Worse than coal? Biomass not so green, scientists say. – Nova Scotia Advocate on Natural Resources Canada GHG Calculator confirms Nova Scotia forest bioenergy schemes are worse than coal
- New Report Estimates Jobs Lost Due to Undeveloped Mining of Protected Areas | Five Bridges Wilderness Heritage Trust on Now NS Mining Association blames Parks & Protected Areas for economic woes
Archives
- September 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- November 2023
- September 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
Categories
- About the website
- Acadian Forest
- Biomass
- Biophilia
- Certification
- Citizen Science
- clearcuts
- Climate Change
- Conservation
- Corbett-Dalhousie Lakes
- deforeststion
- Economics
- Ecosystem Services
- events
- Fire
- Fish
- Forest Certification
- Gold Mining
- hardwoods
- herbicides
- HPMV
- Ind Rev Post-Report
- Independent Review
- Indigenous Peoples
- L&F
- Landscape Level Planning
- Letters&Editorials
- Lichens
- Loon Lake
- Lumber
- Mi'kmaq
- Mining
- Natural History
- Natural Resources & Renewables
- New PC Government
- NSDNR
- NTFP
- Old Growth
- Parks & Protected Areas
- Pests
- Post NP mill
- Private Woodlots
- Pulp & Paper
- Rankin
- Recreation
- Selection Harvest
- Show Us the Science
- Social Media
- Social Values
- softwood lumber
- spraying
- Tree Harvests
- Triad
- Uncategorized
- Urban forest
- Variable Retention
- Wabanaki Forest
- Watersheds
- WestFor
- Wildlife
- Wood Construction
- Woodscamp
Meta